Cases 81 - 90 of 311
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fondren v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00998
Defendant:
John Doe's, 1-5, Smith & Nephew p.l.c., Greenwood Leflore Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Davis et al
as 1:2019cv00976
Defendant:
John Doe 1-10 and Brittany Davis
Plaintiff:
Stephen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00116
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cohn v. Gulan et al
as 1:2018cv03253
Plaintiff:
Edward S. Cohn
Defendant:
Nikola Gulan and Marlene Gulan
Counter Defendant:
Cohn, Goldberg & Deutsche, llc (CGD), Paul Mangione, Shannon Steeg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
White v. City of Hagerstown et al
as 1:2018cv03232
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 3, Officer McKay #5086, Officer John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Rory D White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. City of Hagerstown et al
as 1:2018cv03232
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 3, Officer McKay #5086, Officer John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Rory D White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farrell v. Cornerstone Financial Services et al.
as 1:2018cv02932
Plaintiff:
Christinia Farrell
Defendant:
CORNERSTONE FINANCIAL SERVICES and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Murray v. Graham et al
as 1:2018cv02317
Defendant:
Derek McIlwee, Officer Beal, Richard J Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Murray and Samuel H. Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d
Johnson v. Maryland Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2018cv01059
Plaintiff:
Reginald Johnson
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Transportation, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
