Cases 81 - 90 of 338
JOHNSON v. DOE 1 et al
as 4:2020cv00579
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ALLAN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis-Bey v. Pooler et al
as 1:2020cv24967
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, Judge Teresa Pooler and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Davis-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Augustine v. Snyder et al
as 2:2020cv00808
Defendant:
FNU Snyder, FNU Ashley, FNU Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Augustine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Americas, Inc. v. Siemens Energy, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv01845
Defendant:
John Doe #2, Siemens Energy Inc., John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Americas, Inc.
Interested Party:
General Electric Company
Dean v. Doe et al
as 5:2020cv00428
Defendant:
Jane Doe, FNU Tidwell, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Todd G Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dimaio v. Jacksonville Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2020cv00984
Defendant:
Jacksonville Sheriffs Office, John Doe # 2, Armor Healthcare and others
Plaintiff:
Dominic Alan Dimaio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Altman v. Miller et al
as 4:2020cv10088
Defendant:
John Doe, 2, West Care, Kenneth Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Blair Altman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ham v. Inch et al
as 9:2020cv81071
Defendant:
Francisco Acosta, Sargeant John Doe #3, SGT. Salmon and others
Plaintiff:
Ottis Lee Ham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Prisoner Transportation Services, Inc, et al
as 6:2020cv01202
Respondent:
Prisoner Transportation Services, Inc., Deputy John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Petitioner:
Christopher Benson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leung v. Duval County - (Jacksonville) Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2020cv00635
Defendant:
All John and Jane Doe's, Duval County - (Jacksonville) Sheriff's Department, Detective John Doe, #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jahi Shamel Leung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
