Cases 81 - 90 of 117
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2014cv00081
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gerald Jerome Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kodiak Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. v. Burr et al
as 4:2014cv00085
Plaintiff:
Kodiak Oil & Gas (USA) Inc.
Defendant:
Jolene Burr, Ted Lone Fight, Georgianna Danks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EOG Resources, Inc. v. Johnson et al
as 4:2014cv00087
Plaintiff:
EOG Resources, Inc.
Defendant:
P. Diane Johnson, Yvette Falcon, Jolene Burr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sailer et al v. City of Williston
as 4:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sailer , Cameron Bradley , Sharyl Busch and others
Defendant:
City of Williston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Johnson v. Continental Resources, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00032
Plaintiff:
William W. Johnson
Defendant:
Continental Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Singer v. Statoil Oil & Gas LP
as 4:2013cv00138
Plaintiff:
Sheri Johnson Singer
Defendant:
Statoil Oil & Gas LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Dakota Community Bank, N.A.
as 1:2013cv00123
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Johnson and Peggy Johnson
Defendant:
Dakota Community Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patel et al v. David Baumann-Architects, Ltd. et al
as 3:2013cv00063
Plaintiff:
Manish Patel , Krishna Hospitality, LLC and Shree Ram Hospitality Corp.
Defendant:
David Baumann-Architects, Ltd. and Lightowler Johnson Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Johnson v. USA
as 4:2013cv00091
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Bert MacArthur Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
MKB Management Corp et al v. Burdick et al
as 1:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
MKB Management Corp and Kathryn L. Eggleston, M.D.
Defendant:
Birch Burdick , Wayne Stenehjem , Larry Johnson, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
