Cases 81 - 90 of 650
v. Bradley et al
as 3:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Bradley
Defendant:
Officer J. Bradley, Prosecutor Joseph B Myers, Judge Jason B Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whittenburg v. Watkins et al
as 4:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
William Hoyt Whittenburg
Defendant:
Judge Jeffrey Watkins and Judge Larry Bain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittenburg v. Bain et al
as 4:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
William Hoyt Whittenburg
Defendant:
Judge Larry Bain and Judge Jeffrey Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burriss v. The State of Georgia et al
as 4:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Michael Burriss
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Judge Freeseman, Judge Coolidge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BALL v. MILLER et al
as 5:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS LEROY BALL
Defendant:
JUDGE B JR MILLER, SHERIFF DAN KILGORE, LT HEATH EPPINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry v. Abrams et al
as 4:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Julius James Larry, IV
Defendant:
Noah Abrams, Herbert Harley, Jonathan Cour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ledet v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2023cv02840
Plaintiff:
George Ledet
Defendant:
Judge D.V. Reynolds, Judge Charles Chesbro and Haynie Litchfield & White
Jones v. Susan Camp et al
as 1:2023cv02841
Plaintiff:
Keisha Jones
Defendant:
Judge Susan Camp and Rubin Lublin, LLC
State of Georgia v. Mayes
as 1:2023cv02743
Plaintiff:
State of Georgia, Judge Henry Thompson and Attorney Alex Oberkofler
Defendant:
Chauncey Aaron Mayes
Rhodes v. Judge Tom S. Lee et al
as 1:2023cv02680
Plaintiff:
Jon Allen Rhodes
Defendant:
US District Court Judge Tom S. Lee, Supreme Court Of Appeals, 20th District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
