Cases 81 - 90 of 148
Kent v. Unnamed Defendant
as 1:2015cv02010
Plaintiff:
Robert Kent
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Jones et al
as 1:2015cv01803
Plaintiff:
Angel Tynette Harris
Defendant:
Tyndal Michele Jones, M.D., Jacqueline Hayles-Patterson, M.D., Sonya D. Poitier, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JERNIGAN v. EDWARDS et al
as 7:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
THOMAS F JERNIGAN
Defendant:
JOHN KENT EDWARDS, JR and LOWNDES COUNTY STATE COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2015cv00072
Plaintiff:
YVONNE L MURPHY
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, HANCOCK COUNTY GEORGIA, RANDY KENT HARTZELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kent v. Wagner Service Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00292
Plaintiff:
Christy M. Kent
Defendant:
Wagner Service Solutions, Inc. and Ashley Thompson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
KENT v. STOUFFER et al
as 7:2014cv00154
Plaintiff:
JANICE K KENT
Defendant:
STEVEN J STOUFFER, NICOLE STOUFFER, GRANGE INDEMNITY INSURANCE CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RICHARDSON v. COLVIN
as 3:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
KENT ALLEN RICHARDSON, JR
Defendant:
CAROLYN W COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kent et al v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
as 1:2014cv02362
Plaintiff:
Frederick Kent and Lee Kent
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KARASH et al v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
as 4:2014cv00159
Plaintiff:
DEBRA KARASH and KENT KARASH
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRANCO-HERNANDEZ et al v. SOUTHERN VALLEY FRUIT AND VEGETABLE INC et al
as 7:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
ERENDIDA FRANCO-HERNANDEZ , YADIRA GARCIA-MARTINEZ , ESMERALDA PONCE-RUBIO and others
Defendant:
SOUTHERN VALLEY FRUIT AND VEGETABLE INC, HAMILTON GROWERS INC, KENT HAMILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
