Cases 81 - 90 of 665
Riggs v. Morriss
as 2:2022cv04001
Petitioner:
James A Riggs
Respondent:
Kelly Morriss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arps et al v. Chambers et al
as 4:2021cv01410
Plaintiff:
Becky Arps, Rene Artman, Adam Bohn and others
Defendant:
Robert L. Chambers, Marsha E Haefner, Florence Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowman et al v. Chambers et al
as 4:2021cv01406
Plaintiff:
John Bowman, Karen Cloyd, Glenn Koenen and others
Defendant:
Robert L. Chambers, Patricia Yaeger, Marsha E. Haeffner and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Becky Arps, Rene Artman, Adam Bohn and others
Petitioner:
Dr. Sam Page and Cora Faith Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor et al v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 2:2021cv04224
Plaintiff:
Shawn M. Taylor and Kellie Taylor
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc., Sam's Club #8163 and Sam's East, Inc. doing business as Sam's Club #8163
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Morriss
as 4:2021cv01378
Petitioner:
Keenan W. Robinson
Respondent:
Kelly Morriss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AMCO Insurance Company v. Masiakiewicz
as 4:2021cv01348
Counter Defendant:
AMCO Insurance Company
Counter Claimant:
Kelli Masiakiewicz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Yan v. Kaufman et al
as 4:2021cv01337
Plaintiff:
Yan Sheng and Sheng Yan
Defendant:
Kelly Kaufman, Kevin Kaufman, Spa Chi LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Highfill v. DST Systems, Inc
as 4:2021cv09046
Plaintiff:
Kelly Highfill
Defendant:
DST Systems, Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Shannon County, Missouri et al v. L-A-D Foundation
as 1:2021cv00128
Plaintiff:
Shannon County, Missouri, The Shannon County Commission, Dale Counts and others
Defendant:
L-A-D Foundation and United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
