Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 116
Goodelman v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv01283
Plaintiff: Arthur Goodelman, Arthur Goodelman, Arthur Goodelman and others
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics and others
Intervenor: Antitrust Division,Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Ralik v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv01272
Plaintiff: Elena Ralik, Elena Ralik, Elena Ralik and others
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Intervenor: Antitrust Division,Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Ralik v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 4:2007cv01272
Plaintiff: Elena Ralik, Elena Ralik, Elena Ralik and others
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Bart LLC v. Samsung Electronic Co., LTD et al
as 3:2007cv01249
Plaintiff: Bart LLC, Bart LLC, Bart LLC and others
Defendant: Samsung Electronic Co., LTD, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., LG Philips LCD Co. LTD. and others
Intervenor: Antitrust Division,Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Myers v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv01232
Plaintiff: Marshall Myers, Marshall Myers, Marshall Myers and others
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., LG Philips LCD Co., LTD. and others
Intervenor: Antitrust Division,Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Long v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv00028
Plaintiff: Tammy Long and Tammy Long
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, CHI MEI Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Phelps Technologies, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv01231
Plaintiff: Phelps Technologies, Inc., Phelps Technologies, Inc., Phelps Technologies, Inc. and others
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., LG Philips LCD Co., LTD. and others
Intervenor: Antitrust Division,Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Pulasky v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 1:2007cv00032
Plaintiff: John Pulasky
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, CHI MEI Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Kornegay v. LG Philips LCD Co., LTD. et al
as 3:2007cv01146
Plaintiff: Kaine Kornegay, Kaine Kornegay, Kaine Kornegay and others
Defendant: LG Philips LCD Co., LTD., LG Philips LCD America, Inc., LG Electronics Inc. and others
Intervenor: Antitrust Division,Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Chamberlain v. LG Philips LCD Co Ltd et al
as 3:2007cv00533
Plaintiff: Lee R Chamberlain and Lee R Chamberlain
Defendant: LG Philips LCD Co Ltd, LG Philips LCD America Inc, Samsung Electronics Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?