Cases 81 - 90 of 114
Lim, Khor v. Walker, Scott et al
as 3:2012cv00492
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Scott Walker, Staples, Inc., Ron Sargant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, Maurice v. Misner, Micheal et al
as 3:2012cv00384
Plaintiff:
Maurice A. Smith
Defendant:
Micheal Misner , K. Lloyd , Mary Leiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schuenke, Lloyd v. Wisconsin Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv00382
Plaintiff:
Lloyd T. Schuenke
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department Of Corrections , Gary Hamblin , Kathryn R. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smithfield Foods Inc et al v. The United States Department of Navy
as 2:2011cv01148
Plaintiff:
Smithfield Foods Inc , Patrick Cudahy Inc , Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Navy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Torry, Bobbie v. Lloyd, K.
as 3:2011cv00830
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Torry
Defendant:
K. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waldo v. McCulloch
as 2:2011cv00923
Petitioner:
Allan Lloyd Waldo
Defendant:
Deborah McCulloch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schuenke, Lloyd v. Doe, Jane/John et al
as 3:2011cv00518
Plaintiff:
Lloyd T. Schuenke
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe , William Pollard , Belinda Schrubbe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Means, Jerry v. Dodge Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2011cv00235
Plaintiff:
Jerry Means
Defendant:
Dodge Correctional Institution , Jim Schwochert , Carrie Klipfel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. City of Glendale Police Department
as 2:2011cv00183
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Brown, Sr
Defendant:
City of Glendale Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. The Proctor & Gamble Company
as 1:2011cv00061
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Anderson
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company , Bayer CropScience Inc , Bechtel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
