Cases 81 - 90 of 335
Hudson Insurance Company v. 18 Speed Trucking et al
as 1:2018cv00880
Defendant:
BD&J Trucking, LLC, Trans-Lease Mid Continent Van, Trans Recovery - DH Transportation and others
Plaintiff:
Hudson Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Lane v. Saul
as 6:2020cv00084
Plaintiff:
James Lane
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Not Classified By Court:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WRIGHT v. EILLA et al
as 4:2020cv00156
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Lane, Assistant Warden Petterson, Sprayberry and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Frank Wright, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. EILLA et al
as 5:2020cv00230
Plaintiff:
WILLIE FRANK WRIGHT, JR
Defendant:
EVANS, WARDEN SPRAYBERRY, PETTERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRISON v. WHITE et al
as 5:2020cv00156
Defendant:
PATRICIA STYLES, CAPTAIN BROWN, LANE and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH RAY MORRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Smith v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00086
Plaintiff:
Courtney Smith
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Lee Arrendale State Prison, Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Warren et al
as 1:2020cv00060
Defendant:
Sgt. McGee, Officer Warren, Lt. Verdan and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Nathaniel Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POOLE v. PAULK et al
as 7:2020cv00016
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUNTER POOLE
Defendant:
Sgt HARDEN, ASHLEY PAULK, Officer NESMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. 2200 Atlanta Investors, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv05860
Defendant:
Will Sparks, 2200 Atlanta Investors, LLC and CF Lane Real Estate, LLC
Plaintiff:
Francis Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
