Cases 81 - 90 of 219
RooR International BV et al v. Low Bob's #23 River Park et al
as 3:2019cv00101
Plaintiff:
Sream Inc and RooR International BV
Defendant:
Low Bob's #23 River Park and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
RooR International BV et al v. Low Bob's # 1023 et al
as 3:2019cv00097
Plaintiff:
Sream Inc and RooR International BV
Defendant:
John Doe and Low Bob's # 1023
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
RooR International BV et al v. Low Bob #1029 et al
as 3:2019cv00096
Plaintiff:
Sream Inc and RooR International BV
Defendant:
John Doe, Low Bob's #1029 and Low Bob #1029
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
RooR International BV et al v. Low Bob's Ligonier et al
as 1:2019cv00047
Plaintiff:
Sream Inc and RooR International BV
Defendant:
John Doe and Low Bob's Ligonier
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
LOWE v. SMITH et al
as 2:2019cv00061
Defendant:
PHEGELY, FERVIDA, HARTZELL and others
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC A. LOWE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOWE v. SMITH et al
as 2:2019cv00057
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RICHARDS, DOMINIC A. LOWE, BRANT CHEESMAN and others
Defendant:
T. SCHRETTER, K. HARTZELL, KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOWE v. SMITH
as 2:2019cv00022
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC A. LOWE
Defendant:
BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00105
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
THOMAS v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 1:2019cv00016
Defendant:
MELLANDER, DAVIS, CHARLES FAENZA and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV et al v. RICHMOND MASTER DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
as 1:2018cv04051
Plaintiff:
SREAM, INC. and ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV
Defendant:
PATRICK A. CARRICO, RICHMOND MASTER DISTRIBUTORS, INC. D/B/A LOW BOB'S 860 and RICHMOND MASTER DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
