Cases 81 - 90 of 163
Arreola v. Warden Stansberry et al
as 3:2015cv00001
Plaintiff:
Yasin Oriza Arreola
Defendant:
Warden Stansberry, H. A. McWilliams, W. Bennent and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lowe v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv31333
Plaintiff:
Naomi Lowe
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lowe v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv31064
Plaintiff:
David Lowe
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 3:2014cv30702
Plaintiff:
Woodrow V. Walker
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Bowles v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv30524
Plaintiff:
Michael Bowles
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC and Steve Young
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451
Storms et al v. Coloplast Corp. et al
as 2:2014cv27272
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Lowe Storms and Timothy H. Storms
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp. , Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips Machine Service, Inc. v. Southern Coal Corporation, et. al.
as 5:2014cv27107
Plaintiff:
Phillips Machine Service, Inc. and The Combs Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Southern Coal Corporation, Kentucky Fuel Corporation, A & G Coal Corporation and others
Garnishee:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lowe v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv27006
Plaintiff:
Christy L. Lowe
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Lowes Home Centers, LLC
as 3:2014cv24979
Plaintiff:
William A. Lewis
Defendant:
Lowes Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Lowe v. John Doe et al
as 2:2013cv22416
Plaintiff:
Keith W.R. Lowe
Defendant:
Corporal Fernandaz, Sgt. Hilliwitz, Sgt. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
