Cases 81 - 90 of 213
Malone v. Obama et al
as 2:2016cv00259
Plaintiff:
William Charles Malone
Defendant:
Barach Obama and Jacob Lew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Langley et al
as 9:2016cv00191
Defendant:
Langley, Shaun B Munson, Ashley L Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
Jackson and Eddie Lee Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01264
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Malone v. Dutton et al
as 1:2016cv01183
Defendant:
James Kevin Dutton, Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr. and The State of Texas
Plaintiff:
Edward Malone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Malone v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2016cv01014
Petitioner:
Frederick Dewayne Malone
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carrico v. CRST Malone, Inc. et al
as 9:2016cv00168
Plaintiff:
Mickie Carrico
Defendant:
CRST Malone, Inc. , CRST International, Inc. , CRST Expedited, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Malone v. CST Brands, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv00955
Other:
All Parties
Defendant:
Donna M. Boles, Roger G. Burton, CST Brands, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Malone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Malone v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00614
Plaintiff:
Michael F Malone
Defendant:
TD Ameritrade, Inc. and TD Ameritrade Clearing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Malone v. M&M Diversified, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00678
Plaintiff:
David Malone
Defendant:
M&M Diversified, Inc., Marc Buyers and Abee Buyers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Dock-Malone v. Johnson & Johnson Services Inc et al
as 3:2016cv01882
Plaintiff:
Lisa Dock-Malone
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson and DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
