Cases 81 - 90 of 201
Runninghorse v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2016cv00384
Plaintiff:
Michael Runninghorse
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Duke v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2016cv02480
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Duke
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Rutherford County Sheriff Dept., Robert Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fortner v. Bristol-Myers Squibb et al (JRG2)
as 3:2016cv00482
Plaintiff:
Sheila Fortner
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dessert et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al (PLR2)
as 1:2016cv00303
Plaintiff:
Heike Dessert
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mumford v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 2:2016cv02361
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Pfizer Inc.
Plaintiff:
Leslie Mumford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Luckett et al v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2016cv02324
Plaintiff:
Wallace Luckett and Denise Luckett
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Officer Hudson, Officer Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Greene County Board of Education et al (PLR2)
as 2:2016cv00096
Defendant:
Greene County Board of Education and David McLain
Plaintiff:
Teri Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00775
Plaintiff:
Victor Burns
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc., Calvin Johnson, B. Anderson Flatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Correct Care Solution et al
as 2:2016cv02135
Plaintiff:
Mario Marquette Myers
Defendant:
Correct Care Solution, Interpol and P. Echols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Corizon Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00365
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Richards
Defendant:
Corizon Inc., Calvin Johnson, B. Anderso Flatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
