Cases 81 - 90 of 288
Casillas-Prieto v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 3:2019cv00148
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Casillas-Prieto
Defendant:
Fannin County Texas, United States Marshal Service and The GEO Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Brown v. Marshall
as 7:2019cv00108
Plaintiff:
Milton Antoine Brown and Sultan Imanuel El-Bey
Defendant:
T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cabiness v. United States Marshal Service
as 7:2019cv00020
Plaintiff:
Kenya Jamel Cabiness
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marshall v. Unknown
as 1:2019cv00001
Petitioner:
TaQuan Marshall
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Foxworthy et al v. Sluss et al
as 2:2018cv00040
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Jerry Shuler, Ryan Joseph Sluss and others
Plaintiff:
Robert B. Hines, II and Victoria B. Foxworthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Hirschfeld et al v. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al
as 3:2018cv00103
Plaintiff:
Natalia Marshall and Tanner Hirschfeld
Defendant:
Jefferson Sessions, The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Thomas E. Brandon and others
Amicus Curiae:
Brady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Goldstein v. Marshall et al
as 3:2018cv00612
Defendant:
Terrance McCulliffee, John Marshall, Shannon Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
David Goldstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NELSON-EL v. United States Marshals Service
as 1:2018cv00959
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS NELSON-EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Geist v. Tucker Pavillion et al
as 3:2018cv00483
Defendant:
Goochland/Powhatan Mental Health, Anastasia Jones, Food and Drug Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Amy Elizabeth Geist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
