Cases 81 - 90 of 129
McColm v. Trinity County et al
as 2:2012cv01984
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. McColm
Defendant:
Trinity County, Shelly Pourian, Superior Court of California Trinity County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCall v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
as 3:2012cv01788
Plaintiff:
Adam McCall
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gregory Lee McCall v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv05823
Defendant:
P A Duncan and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee McCall
Yapundzhyan v. Kernan
as 4:2012cv03425
Plaintiff:
Armen Yapundzhyan
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, S. Espy, M. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skyline Vista Equities LLC v. Hodje Ramondo Norwood et al
as 2:2012cv04663
Defendant:
Does, Jackie McCall and Hodje Ramondo Norwood
Plaintiff:
Skyline Vista Equities LLC
Jones et al v. Iovate Health Sciences Inc et al
as 3:2012cv01279
Plaintiff:
Darrell Jones , Rosalee Ashley , Steven Barnett and others
Defendant:
Iovate Health Sciences Inc, Iovate Health Sciences Research Inc, Iovate Health Sciences Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gregory Lee McCall v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 2:2012cv03340
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, John Jane Doe, United States Marshal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee McCall
U S Bank National Association v. Miguel O Andrade et al
as 8:2012cv00195
Defendant:
Miguel O Andrade, Teresa Andrade and DOES
Intervenor:
Kenneth McCall
Plaintiff:
U S Bank National Association
Avey v. McCall et al
as 2:2012cv00245
Plaintiff:
Don Avey
Defendant:
Steve McCall, K. Swanson and Cheryl Schutt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Rodriguez et al
as 5:2012cv00269
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hamilton
Defendant:
T Rodriguez, H. Gonzalez, T. Selby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
