Cases 81 - 90 of 154
DAVIS v. COOK MEDICAL LLC et al
as 1:2018cv03552
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Plaintiff:
MEGAN DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02226
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00905
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00110
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
RAYNE v. GANNON et al
as 1:2018cv00076
Defendant:
AMBER ALLEN, LENA ANDERSON, MEGAN ANDREWS and others
Plaintiff:
SARAH RAYNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIRECT CONNECT LOGISTIX, INC. v. RELIABLE SOURCE LOGISTICS, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv04713
Plaintiff:
DIRECT CONNECT LOGISTIX, INC.
Defendant:
BRIAN HAYS, GRETCHEN HAYS, HAYS & SONS COMPLETE RESTORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04388
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04271
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03087
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
IGOU v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv02910
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., DOES 1-20, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
LANCE IGOU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
