Cases 81 - 90 of 121
Crump v. Minnesota Department of Correction et al
as 0:2016cv01286
Petitioner:
Willie James Crump
Respondent:
Minnesota Department of Correction , Tom Roy , Eddie Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abdillahi v. Miles
as 0:2016cv00963
Petitioner:
Hassan Mohamed Abdillahi
Respondent:
Eddie Miles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
O'Neal v. Johnson et al
as 0:2016cv00375
Plaintiff:
Charles Ricardo O'Neal
Defendant:
Brenda Johnson, Amy Johnson, Mandac and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dayton et al
as 0:2015cv04429
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Defendant:
Mark Dayton , Tina Smith , Tom Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Coleman, et al
as 0:2015cv03696
Plaintiff:
Bernard Miles
Defendant:
Michael Coleman, City of Brooklyn Center, Lund and others
Braziel v. Roy et al
as 0:2015cv03448
Plaintiff:
Levi Braziel, Jr
Defendant:
Tom Roy, Eddie Miles, Becky Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graphenteen v. Jesson et al
as 0:2015cv02503
Plaintiff:
John Graphenteen
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Anne Barry, Nancy Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roskens et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02253
Plaintiff:
Gregory B. Roskens , Jim A. Paulin , Jim Paulin Farms and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ligons et al v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2015cv02210
Plaintiff:
Ronaldo Ligons , Barry Michaelson , John Miles and others
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections, Thomas Roy, David A. Paulson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirby et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02007
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Kirby , Green Valley Living Trust , Houck Farms, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
