Cases 81 - 90 of 1,924
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Aldo Moises Gomez Soto v. Warden Ricolcol
as 5:2024cv00297
Petitioner:
Aldo Moises Gomez Soto
Respondent:
Warden Ricolcol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Alexander v. Villalobos et al
as 4:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Alexander, Sr
Defendant:
Moises Villalobos and Dana Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Lopez v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Moises Lopez
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00564
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Moises Ross v. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd et al
as 2:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Moises Ross
Defendant:
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
RIVAS FERRERA et al v. FOULGER-PRATT CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
RAMON ANTONIO RIVAS FERRERA, JOSE FREDYS SANCHEZ AMAYA, GERMAN ALFARO and others
Defendant:
FOULGER-PRATT CONSTRUCTION, INC., CHRISTIAN SIDING, LLC and CHRISTIAN SIDING, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
