Cases 81 - 90 of 996
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00042
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Martinez v. Farris
as 23-6001
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICA ALEXANDER MARTINEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
JIM FARRIS, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Goode v. Farris
as 22-5109
Petitioner:
CLARENCE ROZELL GOODE, JR.
Respondent:
JIM FARRIS, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Loveless v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2022cv00994
Petitioner:
Chris Elroy Loveless
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of and Jason M Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burnett v. Pettigrew et al
as 5:2022cv00993
Petitioner:
Johnny William Burnett
Respondent:
Luke Pettigrew and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pendergraft v. Oklahoma Attorney General's Office et al
as 5:2022cv00985
Plaintiff:
Mark A Pendergraft
Defendant:
Oklahoma Attorney General's Office, Lauren Ray-Morales, Dixie Coffey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wisdom Ministries, Inc. v. Garrett et al
as 4:2022cv00477
Plaintiff:
Wisdom Ministries, Inc.
Defendant:
Allison D Garrett and Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
