Cases 81 - 90 of 190
Lewis v. Colvin
as 6:2016cv03062
Plaintiff:
Peggy S. Lewis
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Linnie J. Kyle Estate et al v. 21st Mortgage Corporation et al
as 6:2015cv03455
Plaintiff:
Linnie J. Kyle Estate, Peggy Joan Kyle-Henningsen and Walter Henningsen
Defendant:
21st Mortgage Corporation, SMF Registered Services, Inc. and Michelle M. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Colvin
as 4:2015cv00671
Plaintiff:
Peggy E. Myers
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Combest et al v. Cotter Corp. et al
as 4:2015cv01011
Plaintiff:
Greg Combest , Michele Curran , Antoinette Durbin and others
Defendant:
Cotter Corp., Mallinckrodt Inc. and Mallinckrodt LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mulvihill v. KC Rink Management L.L.C
as 4:2015cv00478
Plaintiff:
Peggy Mary Mulvihill
Defendant:
KC Rink Management, L.L.C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darrow v. Bottom Line Food Processing, Inc. D/B/A Michael Angelo's Gourmet Food Inc.
as 4:2015cv00440
Plaintiff:
Peggy Darrow
Defendant:
Bottom Line Food Processing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bungart v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv04088
Plaintiff:
Peggy L. Bungart
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
A.M. et al v. State of Missouri Board of Education et al
as 6:2015cv03150
Plaintiff:
A. M. and Joshua Mitchell
Defendant:
State of Missouri Board of Education, Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, State Schools for the Severely Disabled and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
Esposito v. Nixon et al
as 2:2015cv04073
Plaintiff:
Vincent J Esposito
Defendant:
Jay Nixon, George Lombardi, Jason Kander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
