Cases 81 - 90 of 90
United States of America v. Peterson et al
as 4:2008cv00358
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Steven F. Peterson, Pamela M. Peterson, American General Finance, Inc., a/k/a American General Financial Services, Inc., and/or a/k/a American General Financial Services (DE), Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Peterson v. MTD Products Inc.
as 4:2008cv00342
Plaintiff:
Robert J Peterson and Robert J Peterson
Defendant:
MTD Products Inc. and MTD Holdings Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jones et al v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.
as 6:2008cv02049
Plaintiff:
Robert B Jones and Francis Peterson
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smart v. Peterson
as 4:2008cv00086
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Smart
Defendant:
Scott C. Peterson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Peterson v. Prosser et al
as 5:2008cv04005
Plaintiff:
Paul George Peterson
Defendant:
Mark Prosser, Todd Erskine, Ray Eickholt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson v. Smith et al
as 5:2007cv04052
Plaintiff:
Ryan Peterson
Defendant:
Jason Smith, Royster, Brad Wittrock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson v. State of Iowa
as 6:2007cv02043
Petitioner:
Larrisha Peterson
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. STATE OF IOWA
as 4:2007cv00232
Petitioner:
Larrisha Peterson
Respondent:
STATE OF IOWA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2007cv02029
Plaintiff:
David P Peterson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Peterson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2007cv02026
Plaintiff:
Cindy L Peterson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
