Cases 81 - 90 of 571
Haines v. McFadden et al
as 4:2022cv00847
Plaintiff:
David Haines
Defendant:
McFadden, Robinson, Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. McFadden et al
as 4:2022cv00845
Plaintiff:
Kevin L Hamilton
Defendant:
McFadden, Robinson, Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aquirre v. McFadden et al
as 4:2022cv00851
Plaintiff:
Sam Aquirre
Defendant:
McFadden, Robinson, Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. McFadden et al
as 4:2022cv00835
Plaintiff:
Quincy Harris
Defendant:
McFadden, Robinson, Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. McFadden et al
as 4:2022cv00836
Plaintiff:
Bryant Cunningham
Defendant:
McFadden, Robinson, Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clubbs v. McFadden et al
as 3:2022cv00843
Plaintiff:
Derrick Clubbs
Defendant:
McFadden, Robinson, Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosenzweig v. Benton County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2022cv05125
Plaintiff:
Asher Joseph Rosenzweig
Defendant:
Benton County Sheriff's Office, Deputy Laralyn Koster and Lead Nurse Tracey Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Huddleston et al
as 5:2022cv05172
Plaintiff:
Michelle Robinson
Defendant:
Nurse Audrey Huddleston, Sergeant Kendall Clark and Sheriff David Lucas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Griffin et al
as 4:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Joe Griffin, James Moody, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Lay et al
as 2:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Antonio C Robinson
Defendant:
Lay, D W Johnson and Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
