Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 120
Reed v. Thaler et al
as 6:2010cv00339
Petitioner: Charles Ray Reed
Respondent: Director Rick Thaler and The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Thaler et al
as 6:2010cv00337
Petitioner: Charles Ray Reed
Respondent: Director Rick Thaler and The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Thaler et al
as 6:2010cv00340
Petitioner: Charles Ray Reed
Respondent: Director Rick Thaler and The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Thaler et al
as 6:2010cv00341
Petitioner: Charles Ray Reed
Respondent: Director Rick Thaler and The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Thaler et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2010cv00335
Petitioner: Charles Ray Reed
Respondent: Director Rick Thaler and The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Thaler et al
as 6:2010cv00338
Petitioner: Charles Ray Reed
Respondent: Director Rick Thaler and The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Arnold Reed
as 10-10999
Movant: In re: ARNOLD RAY REED
Askew et al v. Citgo Petroleum Corp et al
as 2:2010cv01510
Plaintiff: Gloria Godette Askew, Rapheal Bargeman, Billy Joe Bell and others
Defendant: Citgo Petroleum Corp , Citgo Bayou Industrial Fuels Corp , Citgo East Coast Oil Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arnold Reed v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-10412
Petitioner - Appellant: ARNOLD RAY REED
Respondent - Appellee: RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
In re: Arnold Reed
as 10-10347
Movant: In re: ARNOLD RAY REED

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?