Cases 81 - 90 of 123
Romero v. Cofey et al
as 6:2015cv01905
Defendant:
Carrie Cofey, Dr. Paulson Reed and Steve Shelton, M.D.
Plaintiff:
Danny Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deverell v. Rex et al
as 3:2015cv00836
Plaintiff:
Nina Deverell
Defendant:
Dr. Sean Elliott, Jane Does 1-10, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. Union County Community Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv00813
Respondent:
Ryan Browne, State of Oregon and Union County Community Corrections
Petitioner:
Kelley P. Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doe v. Reed Institute
as 3:2015cv00617
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
The Reed Institute and Jane Roe
Counter Claimant:
Jane Roe
Counter Defendant:
Jane Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Reed v. Military Sealift Command, United states Department of the Navy
as 3:2015cv00077
Defendant:
Military Sealift Command, United states Department of the Navy
Plaintiff:
Rodney Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02064
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Reed v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2014cv01912
Petitioner:
Kelley P. Reed
Respondent:
State of Oregon and Union County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tower Insurance Company of New York v. Rose City Auto Group, LLC, et al
as 3:2014cv00975
Defendant:
Karen Bersine, Laney Blankenship, Teresa Byle and others
Plaintiff:
Tower Insurance Company of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Romero v. Paulson
as 6:2014cv00595
Defendant:
Dr. Reed Paulson
Plaintiff:
Danny Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
