Cases 81 - 90 of 206
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL PLASTERERS TENDERS AND LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY et al v. TEAM CLEAN, INC.
as 2:2015cv06729
Plaintiff:
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL PLASTERERS TENDERS AND LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY and LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, LABORERS LOCAL 332, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
TEAM CLEAN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ROOFERS UNION LOCAL 30 COMBINED HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND et al v. FRANK BEGG ROOFING LLC et al
as 2:2015cv06694
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ROOFERS UNION LOCAL 30 COMBINED HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ROOFERS UNION LOCAL 30 COMBINED PENSION FUND , BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ROOFERS UNION LOCAL 30 COMBINED VACATION FUND and others
Defendant:
FRANK BEGG ROOFING LLC, FRANK BEGG CORPORATION and FRANK BEGG
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. PHILLIPS ENTERPRISE, INC.
as 2:2015cv06490
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND , LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND , BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL HEAVY AND HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
Defendant:
PHILLIPS ENTERPRISE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
PRISONERS UNITED TOGETHER ETAL et al v. WOLF
as 2:2015cv05431
Defendant:
TOM WOLF, KATHLEEN KANE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
JOEZIEL VAZQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DOUGLAS v. THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2015cv00938
Plaintiff:
TROY L. DOUGLAS
Defendant:
THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH and THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. FMC SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2015cv02822
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND , LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND , BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
Defendant:
FMC SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ROOFERS UNION LOCAL 30 COMBINED HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND et al v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2015cv02820
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ROOFERS UNION LOCAL 30 COMBINED HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ROOFERS UNION LOCAL 30 COMBINED PENSION FUND , BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ROOFERS UNION LOCAL 30 COMBINED VACATION FUND and others
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND et al v. N. ABBONIZIO CONSTRUCTION, INC.
as 2:2015cv02721
Plaintiff:
THE BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND , LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL HEAVY AND HIGHWAY HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL PREPAID LEGAL SERVICES FUND and others
Defendant:
N. ABBONIZIO CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
THE BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND et al v. CHOATES GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.
as 2:2015cv02154
Plaintiff:
THE BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL PREPAID LEGAL SERVICES FUND and others
Defendant:
CHOATES GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
