Cases 81 - 90 of 209,036
Darlene Fieste v. James E. Shadid
as 24-1860
Petitioner:
DARLENE FIESTE
Respondent:
JAMES E. SHADID
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Montez Lee, Jr. v. United States
as 24-2017
Petitioner:
Montez Terriel Lee, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
United States of America v. Carrillo
as 24-3157
Defendant:
ROBERT CARRILLO and Robert Carillo
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Lopez-Orduno
as 24-3135
Defendant:
MARCOS LOPEZ-ORDUNO and Marco Antonio Lopez-Orduno
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rocha v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01130
Plaintiff:
Blas Jesse Rocha, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Caraffa #350727 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erika Caraffa
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Medical Department of Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rosado v. United State of America
as 0:2024cv60822
Plaintiff:
Oscar Rosado
Defendant:
United State of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Sosa et al v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2024cv21878
Plaintiff:
Carmenza Rocha Sosa, Gladys Martin and Alba R Martin
Defendant:
United States Of America and James B Merry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Castillo-Castillo v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
Joan Camilo Castillo-Castillo
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Eggleston et al v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03974
Plaintiff:
Jason Eggleston and Kim Henderson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
