Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 95
Transcontinental Insurance Company v. Sutterfield
as 6:2007cv00183
Plaintiff: Transcontinental Insurance Company and Transcontinental Insurance Company
Defendant: Bobbie Bruce Sutterfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Type: Contract Insurance
Nejati v. Transcontinental Insurance Company
as 3:2007cv01023
Plaintiff: Bahram Nejati
Defendant: Transcontinental Insurance Company
Counter Claimant: Transcontinental Insurance Company
Counter Defendant: Bahram Nejati
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Lucas et al v. Assurance Company Of America et al
as 2:2007cv14167
Plaintiff: Robert Lucas and Lucas Waterproofing Company LLC
Defendant: Assurance Company Of America, Assurance Company Of America, Transcontinental Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
HENLEY MANAGEMENT COMPANY et al v. MARSH INC. et al
as 2:2007cv02389
Plaintiff: HENLEY MANAGEMENT COMPANY, BIG BEAR PROPERTIES, INC., NORTHBROOK PROPERTIES, INC. and others
Defendant: MARSH INC., MARSH USA INC., THE CHUBB CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Transcontinental Insurance Company v. Economy Caulking, Inc.
as 8:2007cv00771
Plaintiff: Transcontinental Insurance Company, Transcontinental Insurance Company and Transcontinental Insurance Company
Defendant: Economy Caulking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Type: Contract Insurance
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Transcontinental Insurance Company et al
as 6:2007cv00754
Plaintiff: St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
Defendant: Transcontinental Insurance Company, Transportation Insurance Company and Valley Forge Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Transcontinental Insurance Company et al v. Northwest Construction Company Inc et al
as 3:2007cv00673
Plaintiff: Transcontinental Insurance Company, Transcontinental Insurance Company, Valley Forge Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Northwest Construction Company Inc, Northwest Construction Company Inc, Coyote Ranch Contractors LLC and others
Movant: Simpson Cherry Creek Limited Partnership, Simpson Cherry Creek Limited Partnership, Simpson Cherry Creek Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Type: Contract Insurance
Transcontinental Insurance Company et al v Bob Mathews Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 6:2007cv00022
Plaintiff: Transcontinental Insurance Company, Transcontinental Insurance Company, Transcontinental Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Bob Mathews Construction Company Inc., Robert Mathews, Development Authority of Bulloch County, Georgia and others
Counter Claimant: Development Authority of Bulloch County, Georgia and Development Authority of Bulloch County, Georgia
Counter Defendant: Transcontinental Insurance Company, Transcontinental Insurance Company, Transcontinental Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Type: Contract Insurance
Assurance Company of America v. Lucas Waterproofing Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv14084
Plaintiff: Assurance Company of America and Assurance Company of America
Defendant: Lucas Waterproofing Company, Inc., Lucas Waterproofing Company, Inc., Transcontinental Insurance Company and others
Counter Claimant: Robert K. Lucas and Lucas Waterproofing Company, L.L.C.
Cross Defendant: Transcontinental Insurance Company
Counter Defendant: Assurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Type: Contract Insurance
VanVallis v. Transcontinental Insurance Company
as 9:2007cv00026
Plaintiff: Peter VanVallis
Defendant: Transcontinental Insurance Company and Transcontinental Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?