Cases 81 - 90 of 391
Gerber v. Twitter, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Stephen Gerber and Eric Cohen
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Ashton-Cirillo v. Twitter, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Sarah Ashton-Cirillo
Defendant:
Twitter Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BackGrid USA, Inc. v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv09462
Plaintiff:
BackGrid USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
BackGrid USA, Inc. v. DOES 1-10 et al
as 2:2022cv09461
Plaintiff:
BackGrid USA, Inc.
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 and Twitter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
JACKSON et al v. TWITTER, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv09436
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JACKSON, JULIE BRIGGS and GREGG BUCHWALTER
Defendant:
TWITTER, INC., GOOGLE, LLC, ALPHABET, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
RICHARD et al v. TWITTER, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv09432
Plaintiff:
JACKSON RICHARD, JULIE BRIGGS and GREGG BUCHWALTER
Defendant:
TWITTER, INC., GOOGLE, LLC, META PLATFORMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Richard Jackson et al v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv09438
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JACKSON, JULIE BRIGGS and GREGG BUCHWALTER
Defendant:
TWITTER, INC., GOOGLE, LLC, ALPHABET, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: Hall
as 22-1987
Petitioner:
DANIEL E. HALL, a/k/a Sensa Verogna
Respondent:
UNITED STATES and TWITTER, INC.
Hall v. Twitter, Inc.
as 22-1948
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL E. HALL, a/k/a Sensa Verogna
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC.
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Private Jet Services Group, LLC v. Twitter, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00548
Plaintiff:
Private Jet Services Group, LLC
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
