Cases 81 - 90 of 140
Meacom et al v. National Strategic Protective Services, LLC (TV3)
as 3:2014cv00364
Plaintiff:
Sam Meacom , Bryan Acuff , John T Armes, Sr. and others
Defendant:
National Strategic Protective Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Watkins v. USA
as 1:2014cv00195
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Wendy Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Branch v. Metropolitan Nashville and Davidson County et al
as 3:2014cv01271
Plaintiff:
Emmonie Branch
Defendant:
Metropolitan Nashville and Davidson County , Daron Hall, Ronnie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hacker v. City of Chattanooga et al
as 1:2014cv00175
Plaintiff:
Steven James Hacker
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga , Derek Roncin , Cornelius Gaines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2014cv00590
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyrone Dotson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Wayne Carpenter, Jerry Lester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2014mc00252
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyrone Dotson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Wayne Carpenter, Jerry Lester and others
Dotson v. Walker et al
as 3:2013cv01135
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyrone Dotson
Defendant:
Charles E. Walker, Deborah Housel, Monte D. Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. Walker et al
as 3:2013mc00087
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyrone Dotson
Defendant:
Charles E. Walker, Deborah Housel, Monte D. Watkins and others
Adkisson et al v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. (TV1)
as 3:2013cv00505
Plaintiff:
Greg Adkisson , Donna Adkisson , Dustin Berry and others
Defendant:
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Watkins v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv02583
Petitioner:
Darron Watkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
