Cases 81 - 90 of 65,069
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Manning et al v. Harris County
as 4:2024cv01573
Plaintiff:
Crystal Manning, Mariahlee Mansaw, Melissa Hollins and others
Defendant:
Harris County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Rodriguez v. Barber et al
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Ivan Rodriguez
Defendant:
John Barber and Randall Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murray et al v. Leblanc et al
as 2:2024mc01065
Plaintiff:
Correct Commissary, LLC
Defendant:
James Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0034 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01069
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Victor v. Lafayette Consolidated Government et al
as 6:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
Antoine Victor
Defendant:
Lafayette Consolidated Government, John Doe and X Y Z Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Demunbrun v. Estep et al
as 4:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Demunbrun
Defendant:
Detective Mitchell Estep and Detective Paul Keith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acevedo v. IRS, et al
as 4:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Nancy Acevedo
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Diane Usry, Geralda Larkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cassel v. Todd et al
as 2:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Ashley L. Cassel
Defendant:
Tristen Todd, Karen Bishop, Rebecca Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
