Cases 81 - 90 of 3,638
Wofford v. Gable et al
as 8:2023cv00464
Petitioner:
Nico Wofford
Respondent:
Craig Gable and Rob Jeffrys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wardell v. Westman
as 4:2023cv03200
Petitioner:
Wendel Robert Wardell
Respondent:
John Westman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Frakes et al
as 4:2023cv03214
Plaintiff:
Antwon L. Williams
Defendant:
Scott Frakes, Jeff Kasselman, Dr. Robert Cunard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perales v. USA
as 8:2023cv00546
Petitioner:
Roman Anthony Perales
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Robinson v. Dr. Castleman et al
as 8:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant:
Dr. Castleman, Dr. Brank and Bryan Health Systems
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Boyd et al
as 8:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Hector Gonzales
Defendant:
T. Boyd, Smith, Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Boyd et al
as 8:2023cv00512
Petitioner:
Richard Louis Garcia
Respondent:
Taggart Boyd and Rob Jefferys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avila v. Nebraska Dept of Correctional Services
as 8:2023cv00453
Petitioner:
Antonio Avila, Jr.
Respondent:
Nebraska Dept of Correctional Services
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castro-Santos v. USA
as 8:2023cv00533
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Castro-Santos
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
