Cases 81 - 90 of 1,151
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gonzalez v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2022cv00174
Petitioner:
Tony G. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Patricia A. Coyne-Fague
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bojang v. Rhode Island
as 1:2022cv00182
Petitioner:
Mustapha Bojang
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Onyobeno v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00148
Petitioner:
Wisdom Oghenekaro Onyobeno
Respondent:
Merrick B Garland, United States Marshal Service and Daniel Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Prout v. Department of Corrections, et al.
as 1:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Justin Prout
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Oral Surgeon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Paiva v. Salas et al
as 1:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Richard Paiva
Defendant:
Dr. Christopher Salas, Doctor Justin Berk and Pauline Marcussen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ausar v. Coyne-Fague et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Petitioner:
Kam Ausar and Jeffrey Alston
Respondent:
Patricia A. Coyne-Fague and State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valdez v. USA
as 1:2022cv00181
Petitioner:
Juan Valdez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Johnson v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Ezekial Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Lynn Corry, Patricia A. Coyne-Fague and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Martinez v. Raposo et al
as 1:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Martinez
Defendant:
Investigator Raposo and Patricia A. Coyne-Fague
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
