Cases 81 - 90 of 3,641
Frazier v. City of Omaha
as 8:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
Alphonso V. Frazier, II
Defendant:
City of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Levering v. District 41 of Omaha et al
as 8:2023cv00527
Plaintiff:
Dontavius Levering
Defendant:
District 41 of Omaha, Police Chief O.PD. and Officer Bradford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Boyd et al
as 8:2023cv00512
Petitioner:
Richard Louis Garcia
Respondent:
Taggart Boyd and Rob Jefferys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Omaha, Cty- Prosecutor
as 8:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
Arthur James Griffin, Jr.
Defendant:
Omaha, Cty- Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weathers v. Jeffreys et al
as 8:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Brandon J. Weathers
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Taggert Boyd, E. Staiger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Frakes et al
as 4:2023cv03214
Plaintiff:
Antwon L. Williams
Defendant:
Scott Frakes, Jeff Kasselman, Dr. Robert Cunard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. County Prosecutor
as 8:2023cv00492
Petitioner:
Arthur T. Griffin
Respondent:
County Prosecutor
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Meyers
as 8:2023cv00491
Petitioner:
Arthur James Griffin, Jr.
Respondent:
Micheal Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Campbell v. Wray
as 8:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
Herbert L. Campbell
Defendant:
Christopher Wray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mcswine v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2023cv00488
Petitioner:
Fredrick E. Mcswine
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
