Cases 1 - 10 of 544,704
Renewed Hope Clinical Services, LLC et al v. Change Healthcare Inc.
as 3:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Renewed Hope Clinical Services, LLC and Raincross Family Counseling, Inc.
Defendant:
Change Healthcare Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Talley v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 3:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Talley
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Howard v. TBI et al
as 3:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
William Howard
Defendant:
TBI, FSP Nashville, Chelsea M. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Reeners v. McCormick et al
as 3:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jayson Reeners
Defendant:
Nekeisha Bryant McCormick, Gregory Traylor, Alegra Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Jones
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02150
Plaintiff:
Donna Reynolds
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pentalow v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02156
Plaintiff:
Thomas Pentalow
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mathis v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02128
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mathis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Oconnor v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02130
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Oconnor
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martinez v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02133
Plaintiff:
Katherine Martinez
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
