Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Burley v. Waybourn et al
as 4:2023cv01197
Petitioner:
Rasheed Akeem Burley
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01192
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fehr et al v. Unicorn Freight LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Debra Fehr and Theresa Riley
Defendant:
Unicorn Freight LLC, Diebel Transportation, LLC, Estate of Donald Diebel, Jr. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Rasheed Wall, Akeem Hopkins and Joaquin Murrieta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Harris v. City of Grand Prairie et al
as 3:2023cv00813
Plaintiff:
Akeem Harris
Defendant:
City of Grand Prairie and Grand Prairie Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harris v. Famers Branch Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Akeem Harris and I, I
Defendant:
Famers Branch Police Department, they, them, they and City of Farmers Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nash v. Smith
as 7:2023cv00001
Petitioner:
Akeem Desmond Nash
Defendant:
Warden Jimmy Smith
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richard v. Spencer et al
as 6:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Christopher W Richard
Defendant:
Lucas R Spencer, II, Jeff R Daniel, Babalola A Akeem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv03391
Petitioner:
Akeem Alajuwon Green
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bagley v. Guillen
as 4:2021cv01335
Plaintiff:
Akeem Bagley
Defendant:
Rudy Guillen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
