Cases 11 - 20 of 706
Landerer v. Dover Area School District et al
as 1:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Michelle Landerer
Defendant:
Dover Area School District, Dover Area School District Board of Directors, Nathan Eifert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOMBARDO v. ZANELLI et al
as 5:2024cv01383
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. LOMBARDO
Defendant:
AMY ZANELLI, OFFICER ANDREW YOST, ROBERT L. NICKELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNNICUTT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
AMY LEIGH HUNNICUTT
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
SHENK v. AMY L. GRIFFITHS
as 2:2024cv00957
Defendant:
AMY L. GRIFFITHS and AMY L. SHENK
Plaintiff:
CRAIG A. SHENK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordan v. Barves et al
as 4:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Charles Jerome Jordan
Defendant:
J. Barves, J. Pumphrey, Lt. Bardo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER WRIGHT
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD, AMY BONCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
