Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Clarke v. Romney et al
as 1:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Mitt Romney, Tammy Baldwin, John Barrasso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett et al v. Weldon et al
as 1:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Heather Bennett, James Barrett, Amy Breaux and others
Defendant:
Beth Weldon, Michelle Bonnet Hale, Wade Bryson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tangwall et al v. Satterberg et al
as 4:2020cv00040
Defendant:
George E. Boscher, William R. Satterberg, Jr., Paul R. Lyle and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Tangwall and Donna Uphues
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Uphues et al v. Law Offices of William R. Satterberg, Jr. et al
as 4:2019cv00024
Defendant:
Law Offices of William R. Satterberg, Jr., Thomas Temple and Amy Welch
Plaintiff:
Donna Uphues and Barbara Tangwall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tangwall v. William R. Satterberg, JR, Law Firm et al
as 4:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Donald Tangwall
Defendant:
William R. Satterberg, JR, Law Firm, Amy K Welch and Ben A. Seekins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Borchgrevink v. Rabeau et al
as 3:2014cv00009
Plaintiff:
Estin Borchgrevink
Defendant:
Amy Rabeau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Voyles v. Rabeau
as 3:2012cv00214
Plaintiff:
Earl Voyles
Defendant:
Amy Rabeau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whisler v. Vik et al
as 3:2011cv00118
Plaintiff:
Zebulon Clark Whisler
Defendant:
Curtis Vik , Ramin Dunford , Amy Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cook v. State of Alaska et al
as 4:2008cv00050
Plaintiff:
Amy Cook
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Teague Widmier, Christopher Russell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kurka v. Kurka et al
as 3:2008cv00129
Plaintiff:
Walter J. Kurka
Defendant:
Amy L. Kurka, State of Alaska, Custody Investigator's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
