Cases 1 - 10 of 17
LCKC Enterprises LLC et al v. Temi Pay, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
LCKC ENTERPRISES LLC and LENNY CROUSE
Defendant:
TEMI PAY, LLC doing business as TRUE PAYROLL INTEGRATION and ANDY AZIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Harp v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv02055
Plaintiff:
Andi Harp
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Wolterman v. Hoss et al
as 5:2022cv04022
Plaintiff:
Ryan Wolterman
Defendant:
Jesse Hoss, Andy Yungbluth, Alan Krueger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
El-Amin v. McCarthy et al
as 4:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
Ajamu M El-Amin
Defendant:
Bill McCarthy, Krum, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vogt v. Iowa State Penitentiary et al
as 4:2015cv00006
Plaintiff:
Shelby Anthony Vogt
Defendant:
Iowa State Penitentiary, Maggie Davis, Raleigh Hellmich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. City of Davenport et al
as 3:2014cv00122
Plaintiff:
Michelle Anderson
Defendant:
City of Davenport, Andy Neyrick, Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hays v. Young et al
as 4:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
Jack Hays
Defendant:
Steve Young, Dave Tadman, Deborah Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
