Cases filed in Oregon
Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Bell v. Propm Management Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00847
Plaintiff: Larry L. Bell, Sr.
Defendant: Propm Management Inc. and Yui Andy Tang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Schoene v. Oregon Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2023cv00742
Plaintiff: Kimberly M. Schoene
Defendant: Oregon Department of Human Services, Linda Lawing, Robi Tobar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lilla v. Federal Gov et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv01342
Plaintiff: Shannan Lilla
Defendant: Federal Gov, Federal Consumer Burough, FCBP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alarcon v. Polo
as 3:2022cv00329
Plaintiff: Genessis Alarcon
Defendant: Andy Polo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Morgan et al v. Andy
as 3:2021cv01783
Plaintiff: Grace Morgan and Melissa Lewis
Defendant: Ngo Andy
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Morgan et al v. Ngo
as 3:2021cv01784
Plaintiff: Grace Morgan and Melissa Lewis
Defendant: Andy Ngo
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Paige et al v. Supervisors of the Parole Officers et al
as 6:2020cv01851
Defendant: Cecilia Sanjines, Board of Parole and Probation, Charity Snyder and others
Plaintiff: Richard B. Paige and Lynn Marie Paige
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chung v. 100.3 FM Business
as 3:2020cv01633
Plaintiff: Andy Chung
Defendant: 100.3 FM Business
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Chung v. 107.5 FM et al
as 3:2020cv01099
Defendant: Kristina Doe and 107.5 FM
Plaintiff: Andy Chung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pearson et al v. Porch.com Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00697
Plaintiff: Vaughn Foulger, Holly Garner, Nichole Lynott and others
Defendant: Darwin Widjaja, Matthew Ehrlichman, Brenton Marrelli and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?