Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jacam Chemical Company 2013, LLC v. Shepard et al
as 1:2019cv00093
Defendant:
Arthur H. Shepard, Jr. and Geo Chemicals, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jacam Chemical Company 2013, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Adams et al
as 3:2018mc00004
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Arthur Lamar Adams and Madison Timber Properties, LLC
Jordan v. North Dakota
as 1:2017cv00169
Plaintiff:
Charles Arthur Thomas Jordan, Dr.
Defendant:
North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. USA
as 1:2016cv00147
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Arthur Daniel Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. USA
as 4:2016cv00147
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Arthur Daniel Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Anderson v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00068
Petitioner:
William Arthur Anderson, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Heartland Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2013mc00014
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Arthur H. Bunte, Jr.
Defendant:
Heartland Management, Inc., Lone Eagle Transport, Inc., Ouachita Chemical Transport, Inc. and others
Willoughby v. Hagan
as 1:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ray Willoughby
Defendant:
John Hagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aikins et al v. Warrior Energy Services Corp.
as 1:2013cv00022
Plaintiff:
Donnie Eugene Aikins , Michael Alvarado , Matthew Barros and others
Defendant:
Warrior Energy Services Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Hayden et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas et al
as 1:2010cv00050
Plaintiff:
Arthur M Hayden and Joy Lynn Hayden
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas , Health Care Service Corporation Illinois State PAC NFP and Nabors Industries Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
