Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Chennells v. Curran et al
as 6:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Chennells
Defendant:
Michael J. Curran, Edward Haynes, Will Devin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curran et al v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company et al
as 1:2024cv01419
Plaintiff:
Michael Curran and Timothy Borland
Defendant:
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Compagnie Gnrale des tablissements Michelin SCA, Michelin North America Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 at Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Curran v. Dutchess Cars, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Scott Curran
Defendant:
Dutchess Cars, LLC, Michael Glynn and Dutchess Cars, LLC doing business as DBA Friendly Honda
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Barnes v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant:
Hon. Kath C. Hochul, Richard C. Finnegan, Marisa Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zappia v. Myovant Sciences Ltd. et al
as 1:2023cv08097
Plaintiff:
Joseph Zappia
Defendant:
Myovant Sciences Ltd., Myovant Sciences, Inc., Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Curran v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Mary Curran
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Halberstam v. Myovant Sciences Ltd. et al
as 1:2022cv10788
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Halberstam
Defendant:
Myovant Sciences Ltd., Terrie Curran, Mark Guinan and others
Schiffenbauer v. Myovant Sciences Ltd. et al
as 1:2022cv10467
Plaintiff:
Martin Schiffenbauer
Defendant:
Myovant Sciences Ltd., Terrie Curran, Mark Guinan and others
Bohus v. Joshi et al
as 1:2022cv02203
Plaintiff:
Geza Bohus
Defendant:
Vyomesh I. Joshi, Todd A. Booth, Jeffrey A. Graves and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
