Cases 11 - 20 of 2,071
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00537
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Dowlen v. The City of Springfield, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Kierra Lachelle Dowlen
Defendant:
The City of Springfield, Tennessee and John Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cormia v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Dolwin D. Cormia
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Dunn et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Erik Cooper
Defendant:
James Bruce Dunn, Ronald Crockett Newcomb, William Brownlow Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper v. Sevier County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Erik Cooper
Defendant:
Sevier County, Tennessee, Michael R. Hodges, Jr., Rhett Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baggett, Jr. v. Bural et al
as 2:2024cv02260
Not Yet Classified:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Leonard Ulysses Baggett, Jr.
Defendant:
Randall Scott Bural, Old School Express and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Wesbster v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Javon Webster
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe #062 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
John Doe #062
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe #061 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
John Doe #061
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
