Cases 1 - 10 of 740
Hoglan et al v. Soulas et al
as 1:2024mc21627
Plaintiff:
Candyce S Hoglan, Kui Liong Lee, Kiu Liong Lee and others
Defendant:
Nicole Soulas, Frederick Soulas and Jordan Steiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Hoglan et al v. M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657 et al
as 1:2024mc21628
Plaintiff:
Ju-Hsiu Jian, Jason Ruben Moreno, Christian B Stallworth and others
Defendant:
M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657, M/V Boceanica, IMO Number 9267132, M/V B Luminosa, IMO Number 9256016 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Asimba v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Maureen Achieng Asimba
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, Ted H Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Taylor v. Metropolitan Development Council, Inc.
as 24-2207
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN TAYLOR
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, INC., a Washington State nonprofit organization
Jeannite v. Flaherty et al
as 1:2024cv10364
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
Maureen Flaherty, Charles Marshall, Judge Maura and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ProNM Energy Inc. v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 1:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
ProNM Energy Inc.
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, Debra Anne Haaland, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
