Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
REHFELDT v. GREEN ARROW SOLUTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv01786
Plaintiff: SARAH REHFELDT
Defendant: GREEN ARROW SOLUTIONS doing business as GREEN ARROW LOANS, INTEGRA FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, NEVADA IMPACT MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
REHFELDT v. WAHIDO LENDING et al
as 1:2023cv01756
Plaintiff: SARAH REHFELDT
Defendant: WAHIDO LENDING doing business as RIVER VALLEY LOANS, CREDITSERVE, INC., ERIC WELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
REHFELDT v. ZESTFINANCE, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv01447
Plaintiff: SARAH REHFELDT
Defendant: ZESTFINANCE, INC. doing business as ZEST AI, BLUECHIP FINANCIAL doing business as SPOTLOAN, DOUGLAS MERRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
WALTON v. UPROVA CREDIT LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00520
Plaintiff: AARON WALTON
Defendant: UPROVA CREDIT LLC, UPROVA HOLDINGS LLC, UPPER LAKE PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hall v. Ascend Loans, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01722
Plaintiff: Matthew Hall
Defendant: Ascend Loans, LLC, Uprova Holdings LLC, Upper Lake Processing Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
James A. Garner v. University of Chicago Medical, et al
as 16-3959
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES A. GARNER
Defendant - Appellee: UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER, SARAH O'KEEFE, JASON KANE and others
Medina et al v. Garretson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00040
Plaintiff: Travis Medina, Travis Medina, Sarah Medina and others
Defendant: Joseph A Garretson, Robin W Hunt, Lane K Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?