Cases 1 - 10 of 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hartsough v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03045
Plaintiff:
Vicky Lorine Hartsough
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Koenig v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv01524
Plaintiff:
Edward Charles Koenig, Jr.
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Centurion, Bryan Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01360
Plaintiff:
Vickie Wright
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lee v. Wills et al
as 4:2023cv00658
Plaintiff:
Vickie A Lee
Defendant:
Timothy Wills and SWF Jobsite Services, Inc. d/b/a Elrod Stud Welding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Breon v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00776
Plaintiff:
Vickie L. Breon
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mitchell v. Saint Louis County, Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Juan Mitchell
Defendant:
St. Louis County, Emily Doucette, Raul Banasco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv03288
Plaintiff:
Vicki Carr
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mitchell v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv04172
Plaintiff:
Vickie Marie Mitchell
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rawlins v. Leaffilter North, LLC
as 4:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
Vickie Rawlins
Defendant:
Leaffilter North LLC d/b/a Leaffilter
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
