Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Puccio v. Straka et al
as 2:2010cv01020
Plaintiff:
Christopher Puccio
Defendant:
Straka, John Mcenany, Mike Menster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Maschka
as 1:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Vicki Kay Maschka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Cheshier v. Reyes et al
as 3:2010cv00022
Plaintiff:
Vicki Cheshier
Defendant:
Pascuala C. Reyes and Mercy Medical Center - Clinton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
S.L. Thomas Family Winery, Inc., et. al. v. Lynn Walding
as 3:2010cv00004
Plaintiff:
Michael Liebbe, Michael Liebbe, Michael Liebbe and others
Defendant:
Lynn Walding and Lynn Walding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
as 1:2009cv00041
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. and State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott and Vickie Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Des Moines Quick Cash et al v. Stringer et al
as 4:2009cv00426
Plaintiff:
Des Moines Quick Cash and DES Staffing Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Randy Stringer and Vicky Stringer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cunard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009cv00037
Plaintiff:
Vicki Cunard and Vicki Cunard
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Randolph v. Astrue
as 3:2009cv00083
Plaintiff:
Vicki J. Randolph
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
United States of America v. Holm et al
as 3:2009cv03030
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Vicky Holm, Cindy Balm and Craig Balm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Renda v Ackles
as 4:2009cv00122
Plaintiff:
Melissa Lee Renda
Defendant:
Jim Ackles, Mike Thomas and Vicki Garrett
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
