Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $6,000.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv00054
Defendant: $6,000.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $12,237.00 In United States Currency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00273
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $12,237.00 In United States Currency and $6,000.00 In United States Currency
Claimant: Naisha Gardner and Tamika Jones
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $6,000.00 in United States Currency et al
as 6:2011cv01280
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $6,000.00 in United States Currency and $700.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $6,000.00 In United States Currency
as 2:2009cv01544
Plaintiff: United States of America and United States of America
Defendant: $6,000.00 In United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
United States Of America v. 6,000.00 in United States Currency More or Less et al
as 3:2007cv00376
Petitioner: United States Of America
Respondent: 6,000.00 in United States Currency More or Less and 6,040.00 in United States Currency More or Less
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $6,000.00 in United States Currency
as 1:2007cv01411
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $6,000.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $6,000.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 2:2007cv00897
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $6,000.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 (a)(1)(A) Money Laundering Control Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?