Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Brandt v. Bonder et al
as 1:2018cv00220
Plaintiff:
Eric Patrick Brandt
Defendant:
Joseph Bonder, Joseph (I) Bonder, Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00873
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Dominguez v. Wilson Roofing Division, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00177
Plaintiff:
Jesus Aldo Dominguez
Defendant:
Wilson Roofing Division, LLC, Robin Hill Wilson, Seth Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Williams-Berrien v. Wilson et al
as 1:2015cv00948
Plaintiff:
Derick Lamar Williams-Berrien
Defendant:
David Wilson, Gary Oliver, Robert Petree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Scherbarth et al
as 1:2015cv00823
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Walker
Defendant:
David Scherbarth, David (I) Scherbarth, Wesley Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Wilson
as 15-1055
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM I. WILSON
Wilson v. USA
as 1:2014cv03104
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William I. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Handy v. Dowis et al
as 1:2014cv01323
Plaintiff:
Lawrence P. Handy
Defendant:
Beverly Dowis, Beverly (I) Dowis, Nicole Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faircloth v. Ciolek et al
as 1:2013cv03096
Plaintiff:
James Faircloth
Defendant:
Anne Ciolek, Anne (I) Ciolek, Michael (I) Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Morrissey, et al
as 13-1098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM I. WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MITCHELL R. MORRISSEY, in his official capacity as District Attorney, Denver, County, Colorado, PHILLIP GEIGLE, in his official capacity as Deputy District Attorney, Denver County, Colorado, JOHN RANEY, in his official capacity as Special Agent, HUD-OIG, Denver Office and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
