Cases 1 - 10 of 73
HILLMAN v. SELF et al
as 5:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
MARVIN HILLMAN, III
Respondent:
JUDGE TILLMAN E. SELF, JUDGE CONNIE LYNN WILLIFORD, DISTRICT ATTORNEY CLIFFORD T WOODY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Woody v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Woody
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor, Cleophas Atwater, J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rome v. We Care TLC et al
as 1:2023cv03764
Plaintiff:
Toney Rome
Defendant:
We Care TLC, Angela Woody and Troup County Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rome v. We Care TLC et al
as 3:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Toney Rome
Defendant:
We Care TLC, Angela Woody and Troup County Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YEAGIN v. WALLACE et al
as 5:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
SHANE YEAGIN
Defendant:
SHERIFF WOODY WALLACE, SHERIFF BYRON LYONS, POLK COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODY v. TYSON FOODS INC
as 5:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
TARA WOODY
Defendant:
TYSON FOODS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Saffold v. We Care Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Reginald Lamar Saffold
Defendant:
We Care Corrections, Suzi Woodie and Sheriff James Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
