Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Haberer et al
as 5:2018cv03246
Defendant:
Corizon Company, Connie R. Delperdang, Deane Donley and others
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Norwood et al
as 5:2018cv03136
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Defendant:
Joe Norwood, Kansas Department of Corrections, Douglas Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Newsome v. GEO Group, et al
as 15-2217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS NEWSOME
Defendant - Appellee:
THE GEO GROUP, INC., TIMOTHY HATCH, TOWN OF CLAYTON and others
Davis v. Easter et al
as 5:2015cv03012
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tamar Davis
Defendant:
Jeff Easter, (fnu) Willits, (fnu) Milam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willey et al v. Law Firm of Jeremy Rogers et al
as 2:2013mc01004
Plaintiff:
Roy Willey and Candi Willey
Defendant:
Law Firm of Jeremy Rogers, Jeremy M. Rogers, FNU Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Miller v. Chaves County Detention Center et al
as 2:2013cv00793
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lon Miller
Defendant:
Chaves County Detention Center, FNU Rogers, FNU Elmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Chaves County Detention Center et al
as 1:2013cv00271
Plaintiff:
Alvin Thomas
Defendant:
Chaves County Detention Center, Ralphiel Baraza, Susan Casley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinnell (ID 31576) v. Crow et al
as 5:2011cv03207
Plaintiff:
Rolly O. Kinnell
Defendant:
Sam A. Crow, (fnu) Rogers, 10th Circuit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinnell v. U.S. District Court Judges, et al
as 10-3259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROLLY O. KINNELL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CLERKS, STATE COURTS OF KANSAS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
